Tapered Screw-Vent® (TSV) Dental Implant System

Feels premium, established, authoritative

Features
Benefits
Informational Material
Bibliography

More than 25 years of clinical use and over six million implants sold, the Tapered Screw-Vent (TSV) Implant has gained the trust of thousands of surgeons worldwide to deliver successful patient outcomes. This success is well documented with 130 peer-reviewed papers and a 98.7% cumulative survival rate.

Primary stability achieved by using Tapered Screw-Vent Implants enables immediate placement and/or immediate loading in appropriately selected patients.

Features

  • Screw-Vent Design: Features specialized apical cutting threads for immediate and efficient implant placement
  • Tapered Body: Manufactured from titanium alloy; the tapered design ensures high primary stability and mechanical strength
  • MTX® Surface: A mildly roughened surface that improves bone-to-implant contact, promoting osseointegration
  • MP-1® HA Surface: A high-purity Hydroxyapatite coating (up to 97%) that actively enhances and supports the integration process
  • Platform Plus™ Technology: Internal hex connection with a Friction-Fit system, designed to protect the crestal bone from occlusal forces
  • Cervical Configuration Options: o TSV (1.0 mm): Machined Collar o TSVM (0.5 mm): Machined collar with MTX Crestal micro-grooves o TSVT: Full MTX Microtexturing with MTX Crestal Microgrooves (Model TSVT)

Benefits

  • High Primary Stability: Engineered for immediate stability upon placement
  • Secondary Stability: Enhanced biological integration for long-term stability
  • Crestal Bone Maintenance: Design that supports the preservation of crestal bone
  • Long-term Prosthetic Stability: Ensures durability and stability for prosthetic restorations
  • Documented Clinical Success: Reliability backed by years of clinical data

TSV Animation

TSV™_Seating_a_Final_Abutment

Resources

Brochure

Prosthetic Overview TSV TSX TM Eztetic FINAL

 

Retrieval Tools for TSV, Eztetic and TSX Datasheet Final SECURED

 

TSV and TSX Partially Guided Surgery Solutions Sell Sheet Final Secured

 

TSV Implant with Gold Drills Brochure Final Secured

 

Catalogs

TM and TSV Implant System Product Catalog Final Secured

 

Tm TSV Implant System Product Catalog wdriva_Drills

 

Clinical Cases

TSV Clinical Compendium

 

Manuals

TSV Drilling Sequence Quick Guide Final Secured

 

TM TSV Restorative Manual Final Secured

 

TSV TM Surgical Manual Wdriva Drills Final Secured

 

Bibliography

    1. ata on file with Zimmer Biomet Dental.
    2. Shiigai T. Pilot study in the identification of stability values for determining immediate and early loading of Implants. J Oral Implantol. 2007;33:13-22.
    3. Park SH, Lee KW, Oh TJ, Misch CE, Shotwell J, Wang HL. Effect of absorbable membranes on sandwich bone augmentation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:32-41.
    4. Steigmann M, Wang HL. Esthetic buccal flap for correction of buccal fenestration defects during flapless immediate implant surgery. J Periodontol. 2006; 77:517-522.
    5. Lee CYS. Immediate load protocol for anterior maxilla with cortical bone from mandibular ramus. Implant Dent. 2006;15:153-159.
    6. Cannizzaro G, Felice P, Leone M, Viola P, Esposito M. Early loading of implants in the atrophic posterior maxilla: lateral sinus lift with autogenous bone and Bio-Oss versus crestal mini sinus lift and 8-mm hydroxyapatite-coated implants. A randomised controlled clinical trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2009;2:25-38.
    7. Siddiqui AA, O’Neal R, Nummikoski P, Pituch D, Ochs M, Huber H, Chung W, Phillips K, Wang IC. Immediate loading of single-tooth restorations: one-year prospective results. J Oral Implantol. 2008;34:208-218.
    8. Ormianer Z, Schiroli G. Maxillary single-tooth replacement utilizing a novel ceramic restorative system: results to 30 months. J Oral Implant ol. 2006;32: 190-199.
    9. Artzi Z, Parsori A, Nemcovsky CE. Wide-diameter implant placement and internal sinus membrane elevation in the immediate postextraction phase: clinical and radiographic observations in 12 consecutive molar sites. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18:242-249.
    10. Khayat PG, Milliez SN. Prospective clinical evaluation of 835 multithreaded Tapered Screw-Vent implants: results after two years of functional loading. J Oral Implantol. 2007;34:225-231.
    11. Ormianer Z, Garg AK, Palti A. Immediate loading of implant overdentures using modified loading protocol. Implant Dent. 2006;15:35-40.
    12. Lee CYS, Rohrer MD, Prasad HS. Immediate loading of the grafted maxillary sinus using platelet rich plasma and autogenous bone: a preliminary study with histologic and histomorphometric analysis. Implant Dent. 2008;17:59-73.
    13. Lee CYS, Hasegawa H. Immediate load and esthetic zone considerations to replace maxillary incisor teeth using a new zirconia implant abutment in the bone grafted anterior maxilla. J Oral Implantol. 2008;34:259-267
    14. Ormianer Z, Palti A. Long-term clinical evaluation of tapered multi-threaded implants: results and influences of potential risk factors. J Oral Implantol. 2006;32:300-307.
    15. Rosenlicht JL. Advancements in soft bone implant stability. West Indian Dent J 2002; 6: 2-7.
    16. Trisi P, Marcato C, Todisco M. Bone-to-implant apposition with machined and MTX microtextured implant surfaces in human sinus grafts. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003; 23(5): 427-437.
    17. Todisco M, Trisi P. Histomorphometric evaluation of six dental implant surfaces after early loading in augmented human sinuses. J Oral Implantol. 2006;32(4):153-166.
    18. El Chaar E, Bettach R. Immediate placement and provisionalization of implant-supported, single-tooth restorations: a retrospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2011; 31(4).
    19. Consolo U, Travaglini D, Todisco M, Trisi P, Galli S. Histologic and biomechanical evaluation of the effects of implant insertion torque on peri-implant bone healing. J Craniofac Surg. 2013; 24: 860-865.
    20. Trisi P, Todisco M, Consolo U, Travaglini D. High versus low implant insertion torque: a histologic, histomorphometric, and biomechanical study in the sheep mandible. The Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011; 26: 837-849.
    21. Mihalko WM, May TC, Kay JF, Krause WP. Finite element analysis of interface geometry effects on the crestal bone surrounding a dental implant. Implant Dent. 1992;1:212-217.
    22. Chun HJ, Shin HS, Han CH, Lee SH. Influence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21:105-202.
    23. Brunette DM, Chehroudi B. The effects of the surface topography of micromachined titanium substrata on cell behavior in vitro and in vivo. J Biomech Eng 1999;121(1):49-75.
    24. Cosyn J, Sabzevar MM, de Wilde P, de Rouck. Two-piece implants with turned versus microtextured collars. J Periodontal 2007;78:1657-1663.
    25. Mazor Z, Cohen DK. Preliminary 3-dimensional surface texture measurement and early loading results with a microtextured implant surface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18(5):729-738.
    26. Chehroudi B, Gould TRL, Brunette DM. Effects of a grooved titanium-coated implant surface on epithelial cell behavior in vitro and in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res 1989;23:1067-1085.
    27. Harel N, Piek D, Livne S, Palti A, Ormianer Z. A 10-Year retrospective clinical evaluation of immediately loaded tapered maxillary implants. Int J Prosthodont 2013; 26: 244-249.
    28. Ormianer Z, Palti A. The use of tapered implants in the maxillae of periodontally susceptible patients: 10- Year Outcomes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012; 27: 442-448.
    29. Binon PP. The evolution and evaluation of two interference-fit implant interfaces. Postgraduate Dent. 1996;3:3-13.
    30. Burgess AV, et al. Highly crystalline MP-1 hydroxylapatite coating. Part I: in vitro characterization and comparison to other plasma-sprayed hydroxylapatite coatings. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1999;10:245–256.
    31. Shin SY, Han DH. Influence of a microgrooved collar design on soft and hard tissue healing of immediate implantation in fresh extraction sites in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:804-814.
    32. American Society for Testing and Materials Committee on Standards. Designation B348-94. Standard specification for titanium. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. Vol. 02.04. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials, 1994: 141-146.
    33. American Society of Testing and Materials International. Designation F67-06. Standard specification for unalloyed titanium for surgical implant applications. 2006.
    34. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 5832-2: Implants for surgery – metallic materials – part 2: unalloyed titanium. Available online at: http://www.iso.org.
    35. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 5832-2: Implants for surgery – metallic materials – part 3: wrought titanium. 1996. Available online at: http://www.iso.org.
    36. Chang YL, et al. Biomechanical and morphometric analysis of hydroxyapatite-coated implants with varying crystallinity. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;57:1096–1108.
    37. Lee JW, et al. Preliminary Biomechanical and Histological Evaluations of Implants with Different Surfaces in an Ovine Model: Abstract presented at AO 2013 Conference, Tampa, Florida. (Study of 60 implants[30 each – Zimmer MP-1 HA and Straumann SLActive] placed bilaterally by a licensed clinician in femoral condyles of ovines [6 implants per ovine]).