T3® PRO Tapered Dental Implant

Engineered for Immediacy and High Apical Stability

The T3 PRO® tapered implant represents the next generation of the clinically documented T3® and Osseotite® implant systems. Designed for high primary stability and long-term clinical success, the T3 PRO supports predictable functional and aesthetic outcomes, meeting the demands of modern implant dentistry.

It offers the capability for:

  • Immediate or early loading in selected cases.
  • Reduced treatment times.
  • High aesthetic performance.
  • Long-term stability and reliability.

Features

  • Implant Design o Core Geometry: Features a fully tapered implant core with progressively increasing thread depth o Thread Design: Incorporates aggressive threads that cut deeper into the bone o Stability: These threads enable high Initial Bone-to-Implant Contact (IBIC), especially in the apical region
  • Hybrid Surface (Coarse and Fine) o Osseointegration: The surface is shown to facilitate the osseointegration process o Clinical Safety: It presents no higher risk of peri-implantitis compared to machined titanium o Bone Health: The surface supports the maintenance of healthy bone levels

Benefits

Immediate Loading

  • Clinical Flexibility: Allows for immediate loading when sufficient primary stability and proper occlusal conditions are achieved
  • Versatility: Suitable for both single-tooth restorations and multiple-unit reconstructions

Protection Against Peri-implant Disease

  • Surface Safety: The Osseotite® surface demonstrates no higher risk of peri-implantitis compared to machined titanium surfaces
  • Bone Preservation: Supports the maintenance of healthy, stable bone levels around the implant, enhancing long-term prognosis

Interface Stability (Certain® Connection)

  • Hermetic Seal: The combination of SureSeal™ technology and Platform Switching provides superior sealing at the implant-abutment interface
  • Reduced Micro-movement: Minimizes micro-movements and micro-leakage, ensuring structural integrity and the long-term success of the restoration

T3 PRO Implant

Resources

T3 Pro Tapered Implant Sellsheet Secured

T3 Tapered Implant Brochure Secured

External Hex Ordering Info Brochure

Certain Implant System Product Catalog Final Secured

T3 Pro Case Book Final Secured

T3 Pro White Paper Final Secured

T3 and T3 Pro Drilling Sequence Quick Guide

Surgical Manual T3-T3 Pro Osseotite

Tapered Implant Surgical Kits and Components Assemply-QNTSK Premium Kit

1 Degidi M, Daprile G, Piattelli A, Iezzi G. Development of a new implant primary stability parameter: insertion torque revisited. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013 Oct;15(5):637-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00392.x. Epub 2011 Oct 18. PMID: 22008885.

2 Davies JE, Ajami E, Moineddin R, Mendes VC. The roles of different scale ranges of surface implant topography on the stability of the bone/implant interface. Biomaterials. 2013 May;34(14):3535-46. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.01.024. Epub 2013 Feb 14. PMID: 23415644.

3 Davies JE. Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing. J Dent Educ. 2003 Aug;67(8):932-49. PMID: 12959168.

4 Park JY, Gemmell CH, Davies JE. Platelet interactions with titanium:modulation of platelet activity by surface topography. Biomaterials. 2001 Oct;22(19):2671-82. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(01)00009-6. PMID: 11519787.

5 Davies JE, Mendes VC, Ko JC, Ajami E. Topographic scale-range synergy at the functional bone/implant interface. Biomaterials. 2014 Jan;35(1):25-35. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.072. Epub 2013 Oct 4. PMID: 24099707.

6 Zetterqvist L, Feldman S, Rotter B, Vincenzi G, Wennström JL, Chierico A, Stach RM, Kenealy JN. A prospective, multicenter, randomized-controlled 5-year study of hybrid and fully etched implants for the incidence of peri-implantitis. J Periodontol. 2010 Apr;81(4):493-501. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.090492. PMID: 20367092.

7 Calvo-Guirado JL, Gómez-Moreno G, Delgado-Ruiz RA, Maté Sánchez de Val JE, Negri B, Ramírez Fernández MP. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of osseotite-expanded platform implants related to crestal bone loss: a 10-year study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Mar;25(3):352-358. doi: 10.1111/clr.12134. Epub 2013 Feb 21. PMID: 23425107.

8 Schropp L, Wenzel A, Stavropoulos A. Early, delayed, or late single implant placement: 10-year results from a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Dec;25(12):1359-65. doi: 10.1111/clr.12273. Epub 2013 Oct 8. PMID: 25040354.

9 Schropp L, Wenzel A, Spin-Neto R, Stavropoulos A. Fate of the buccal bone at implants placed early, delayed, or late after tooth extraction analyzed by cone beam CT:10-year results from a randomized, controlled, clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 May;26(5):492-500. doi: 10.1111/clr.12424. Epub 2014 Jun 2. PMID: 24890861.

10 Schropp L, Isidor F. Papilla dimension and soft tissue level after early vs. delayed placement of single-tooth implants: 10-year results from a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Mar;26(3):278-86. doi: 10.1111/clr.12489. Epub 2014 Sep 27. PMID: 25263735.

11 Testori, Tiziano & Galli, Fabio & Capelli, Matteo & Zuffetti, Francesco & Buti, Jacopo & Esposito, Marco. (2021). Immediate nonocclusal versus early loading of dental implants in partially edentulous patients —15-year follow-up of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Clinical Trials in Dentistry. 03. 05. 10.36130/CTD.01.2021.02.

12 Galli F, Capelli M, Zuffetti F, Testori T, Esposito M. Immediate non-occlusal vs. early loading of dental implants in partially edentulous patients: a multicentre randomized clinical trial. Peri-implant bone and soft-tissue levels. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Jun;19(6):546-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01530.x. Epub 2008 Apr 16. PMID: 18422981.

13 Lazzara RJ, Testori T, Trisi P, Porter SS, Weinstein RL. A human histologic analysis of osseotite and machined surfaces using implants with 2 opposing surfaces. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1999 Apr;19(2):117-29. PMID: 10635177.

14 Testori T, Wiseman L, Woolfe S, Porter SS. A Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study of the Osseotite Implant: Four-Year Interim Report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001 Mar-Apr;16(2):193-200.

15 Park SJ, Sanchez O, Ajami E, Wen HB. Bacterial Adhesion to Different Dental Implant Collar Surfaces: An in-vitro comparative study. 34th Annual Meeting Academy of Osseointegration, Washington, DC, March 2019.

16 Bermejo P, Sánchez MC, Llama-Palacios A, Figuero E, Herrera D, Sanz Alonso M. Biofilm formation on dental implants with different surface micro-topography: An in vitro study. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2019 Aug;30(8):725-34.

17 Schmidlin PR, Müller P, Attin T, Wieland M, Hofer D, Guggenheim B. Polyspecies biofilm formation on implant surfaces with different surface characteristics. Journal of Applied Oral Science. 2013 Jan;21:48-55.

18 Subramani et al. Biofilm on dental implants: a review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009; 24(4):616-26.

19 Lazzara RJ, Porter SS. Platform switching: A new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels. Int J Perio Rest Dent. 2006;26:9-17.

20 Boitel N, Andreoni C, Grunder U, Naef R, Meyenberg K. A three year prospective, multicenter, randomized-controlled study evaluating platform switching for the preservation of peri-implant bone levels. Poster Presentation P83: Academy of Osseointegration, 26th Annual Meeting: 2011 March 3-5; Washington DC.

21 Suttin Z, Towse R, Cruz J. A novel method for assessing implant-abutment connection seal robustness. Poster Presentation (P188): Academy of Osseointegration, 27th Annual Meeting, March 2012; Phoenix, AZ. Note: The authors conducted this research while employed at Zimmer Biomet. Pre-clinical and/or bench top studies are not necessarily indicative of clinical performance.

22 Al-Jadaa A, Attin T, Peltomäki T, Schmidlin PR. Comparison of three in vitro implant leakage testing methods. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Apr;26(4):e1-e7. doi: 10.1111/clr.12314. Epub 2013 Dec 16. PMID: 24330007.

23 Pre-clinical and/or bench top studies are not necessarily indicative of clinical performance.