Impression Copings and Analogs

Absolute certainty in impression taking with the signature “click” of correct positioning!

Features
Benefits
Informational Material
Bibliography

Achieve absolute confidence in impression taking with our innovative impression copings, featuring a distinct “click” sound to confirm precise seating. Thanks to the smart “finger design” with a reduced 2 mm submersion into the implant (compared to the 4 mm of a standard abutment), the system allows for easy removal of the impression, even in cases with divergent implants.

The series includes specialized components, such as the Pick-Up Impression Coping, the Twist Lock™ Impression Coping, and the Laboratory Analog, ensuring superior precision at every stage of the restoration.

Features

  • Variety of types: Available for both open and closed-tray impression techniques.
  • Dimensions: Available in various emergence profiles and diameters (3.4, 4.1, 5, and 6 mm) to align with healing screws.
  • Engagement design: Feature a "shorter engagement" design into the implant.
  • Component types: Include Pick-Up Impression Coping, Twist Lock™ Impression Coping, and Laboratory Analog.

Benefits

  • Flexibility for divergent implants: The “shorter engagement” design allows for the draw of the impression even in cases where implants are not parallel
  • Transfer accuracy: The closed-tray impression copings ensure the accurate transfer of the implant position and connection
  • Stability: Absolute stability is ensured between the impression coping and the implant analog before the application of the impression material

Resources

Brochure

Implant And Abutment Level Impression Brochure

 

Manual

T3 Osseotite Implant Restorative Manual

 

Bibliography

  1. Zitzmann NU, Berglundh T. Definition and prevalence of peri-implant diseases. J Clin Perio. 2008;35:286–291.
  2. Lazzara RJ†, Porter SS†. Platform Switching: A new concept in implant dentistry for controlling post restorative crestal bone levels. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2006;26:9-17.
  3. Fransson C, Lekholm U, Jemt T, Berglundh T. Prevalence of subjects with progressive bone loss at implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2005;16:440–446.
  4. Suttin Z††, Towse R††. Effect of abutment screw design on implant system seal performance. Presented at the European Association for Osseointegration, 20th Annual Scientific Meeting; October 2012; Copenhagen, Denmark.